Harris has talked about some types of
rewriting techniques so far, and the technique he introduces in this chapter
seems pretty different from previous ones. He tells that previous ones are”
ways of marking out [our] words and ideas from those of the texts [we] are
working with“, and by doing so we create a dialogue shape in our writing. For most
academic essay, he says, we are merely applying “the idea of a writer to a certain
subjects, with the aim not so much of testing those ideas but if proving their
validity”, or providing more examples of what already had been argued by
others. However, taking an approach is different. It seemed so similar with
forwarding when I first read Harris’s description in this chapter, but he makes
clear of his point about it. Simply, whatever he talked in previous chapters
are rewriting others’ ideas or arguments while taking an approach is rewriting
their style. We need to transform others’ writing into our own, which is not
merely replaced or rebutted. He gives the easiest example for us, music. We
have seen so many songs were rewritten into different styles by different
singers, and they should be creative and original while keeping the same
message to their audience. That is the same for films, paintings, and writings.
Any types of “text” can be taken an approach and the audiences can decide which
is good or bad. Harris gives three ways of taking an approach in this chapter, acknowledging
influences, turning an approach on itself, and reflexivity, and these help us,
writers to rethink and rewrite others’ work, and make stronger bond between the
two.
I like how you summarize the previous techniques that Harris discussed. Like you I was also confused at first by the difference between forwarding and taking an approach. Once you write out the two ideas next to each other it is easier to understand the difference. Taking an approach is using an author's style and not just their ideas. Your blog is very helpful in making the difference apparent as well as providing examples of this technique.
ReplyDeletei like how you included quotes to show what you were talking about.i like how you summed up that this includes the previous chapters. I didn't think about it in terms of a bond between the two before reading this but i think that's really interesting.
ReplyDelete