As I grow up from age of not so high to super
high technology, I have questioned myself many times. Is this okay? Am I safe
here? Today, you can call something free on your phone; you can skype with
anyone you want who is thousands miles away; you can hold meetings with your partners
who works in different countries in different language, and you can “travel” our
last frontier, the universe simply by looking at some sorts of websites. At first,
it took hundreds of years to invent a giant computer, which barely does things
expects for recording words. In tens of years, engineers developed computer in much
smaller and lighter size, and it became the tool of searching information in
short time. In a short few years, computer becomes a tool that connects people around
the world. Literally, people do everything and anything on computer, which is
not only a form of giant desktop, but also a form of laptop, tablet, and phone.
Countless thoughts and ideas are in people’s hands. High technology truly has
been a huge useful tool that everyone can use in daily life, and most people appreciate
this phenomenon. However, really? We have to rethink about this.
Chris hedges scornfully questions this
phenomenon, furthermore, criticizes the majority of the society lives in a “non-reality-based
belief system,” by which means people decides their choice based on simple information
such as images and symbols, not based on intellectual, well-educated,
word-based, trustworthy information. In his world, we do not know what we know;
we are gradually becoming illiterate. It is a shocking fact that many recent
debates of presidents are sixth- or seventh-grade level, which tells this high technology
society does not really help people be “literate.” Literacy does not mean if
one can read abcs, but if one can understand the meaning of words that others
speak; if people can’t really constantly in a long period of time and just try
to understand by feelings, then there will be a world with only pictures and
symbols in near future.
Nicholas Carr answers his question “Is
Google Making Us Stupid?” by talking about blind spots that the high technology
brings to us. He claims that he and many friends of him have a hard time to read
deeply in a long period of time, and easily get distracted by looking for
something else to do. I believe this isn’t only his problem. We all always try
to do multiple things at the same time, particularly while we are online. We seek
convenience, and skim through hundreds of words in a second. We work like a
machine. I liked Carr’s use of word “staccato” quality because it perfectly
describes our life system. All we do is segmented: read a paragraph of a long
article, read only headlines of daily news, chat with friends for a few
minutes, etc. I think if we continuously live in this way, then we will be
worse than Internet because Internet at least has all these “knowledge” within
it but humans don’t. The golden age of intellectual discovery would be only for
Internet itself.
The messages from these two authors are
clear. Internet (searching machine) is truly helpful but if people only follow
that paths, than they will be not only illiterate, but also blank and ignorant.
I like how you started with an introduction that both introduced the main points of the articles and also illustrated how those main points are a part of our daily lives. I agree that there are both positives and negatives to all of the growth in technology, and how we need to be aware of how those negatives are impacting our lives.
ReplyDelete